Potter’s Potty About Perceived Change in Ruck-Speed

St Helens coach Mick Potter seems to have noticed a trend in refereeing this season, one which he feels is affecting his team and hje’s not too happy about it. Potter claims that referees are slowing down the speed of the play-the-ball, and that St Helens are unable to get over the advantage line as quickly:

“It is harder to get over the advantage line with your dummy halves if the rucks are slower.

“Having good dummy halves, who get over that advantage line, is a great asset to have and that has been St Helens’ strength over the past few seasons.

“I did not know there was going to be a change – if there has been somebody needs to tell me but what am I seeing at the moment is a slower ruck.”

On the one hand, if  there has been an official mandate from the RFL that the play-the-ball is to be slowed down and this hasn’t been communicated to the coaches, then that’s a mis-step. They have a right to know what rules theyll be playing to, as it can affect gameplans and coaching decisions. Also, assuming that the interpretation of a slower PTB is in order to change the speed of the game, actually telling the coaches about it means they are far more likely to actually adopt plays that work with slower rucks. How can teams adapt to new parameters if they don’t even know that they’re using them?

On the other hand, if there has been a concsious decision to slow down the speed of the ruck, then good. A fast ruck may encourage a frantic, entertaining style of play, but it isn’t condusive to ball skills. It’s telling that the coach of St Helens is the one who’s brought this up, because if any side relies on a quick play-the-ball it’s Saints. A large portion of their attacking style is based on getting a quick play-the-ball and letting James Roby or Leon Pryce run at a still-retreating line. I’ve been trying to write an epic piece on the importance of the defensive attitude of the NRL in establishing its dominance (Potter’s comments serve as a reminder to finish it) and allowing a slower ruck-speed here is a good first step in trying to develop players who can compete under international rules.

Advertisements

Tags: , , ,

One Response to “Potter’s Potty About Perceived Change in Ruck-Speed”

  1. James Says:

    It’s ironic that Potter is saying this as the Dragons, under him, were possibly the team that most benefited from slowing the game down. With their big, but not too mobile, pack, they were reliant on dominating in the tackle and using their skilful ball players (of which they had and still have more than their fair share) to create. They were also susceptible to teams getting out of dummy half quickly and exploiting lazy/slow markers and ‘A’ defenders.

    I wonder what Potter would have said about the perceived changes were he still coaching in Perpignan?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: